Decide on a topic It will help you considerably if your topic for your literature review is the one on which you intend to do your final M. However, you may pick any scholarly topic. Identify the literature that you will review: Familiarize yourself with online databases see UMD library resource links below for help with thisidentifying relevant databases in your field of study.
Avoid common errors of punctuation and grammar. Use the first person I, we rather than the passive voice. Link your ideas into a sensible sequence without repetitions or discontinuities.
Get feedback on your article from colleagues. In this Background section, make the topic interesting by explaining it in plain language and by relating it to actual or potential practical applications. Explain any scientific principles underlying the topic. Define and justify the scope of the review: LITERATURE In this short section you should list how many of each kind of publication you summarized for example, 31 original investigations, one monograph, five reviews, four popular articles, one manuscriptand how you found them for example, a search of the sport-science database SportDiscus.
Be specific about any database search you performed. Include the key words you used, and the ways you refined your search if necessary.
We read 47 of these as full papers. Of the 41 papers cited in this review, we were able to obtain the following only in abstract form: Do not give a summary paper-by-paper; instead, deal with themes and draw together results from several papers for each theme.
I have identified four themes for this section: These themes are dealt with under subheadings. I encourage you to use such subheadings, which will make it easier for you to write the review and easier for others to read it.
Quality of Published Work Look critically at any published work. The fact that something has been published does not mean the findings are automatically trustworthy.
Some research designs are better than others see Hopkins, a. The most trustworthy conclusions are those reached in double-blind randomized controlled trials with a representative sample of sufficient size to detect the smallest worthwhile effects. The weakest findings are those from case studies.
In between are cross-sectional studies, which are usually plagued by the problem of interpreting cause and effect in the relationship between variables. How subjects were sampled is an important issue. Be wary of generalizing results from novice athletes to elites.
Something that enhances performance in young or untrained individuals may not work so well in highly trained athletes, who may have less headroom for improvement. There are big differences in the way data can be collected.LITERATURE REVIEW OF THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF CORPORATION TAX Part of the Economic Impact Assessment of Irelands orporation Tax Policy Department of .
Choosing your research topic is an important step in writing a literature review. First, choose a strong topic and one you're interested in. You don't want a topic that is too narrow or one that has little or no research about it.
Definition. A literature review is both a summary and explanation of the complete and current state of knowledge on a limited topic as found in . I have been asked a few times for a blog post on how to conduct a proper literature review.
This is hard to do sometimes because a lot of people have different methods to do their reviews of the literature (see examples here, here, here and here).
I tweeted a few of the steps I undertake, but I. Sample APA Papers: Literature Review This section offers a sample literature review, written by an undergraduate psychology student at Purdue University.
Since it's a real paper written by a real student, we haven't corrected the student's errors, but have instead . Rule 1: Define a Topic and Audience. How to choose which topic to review?
There are so many issues in contemporary science that you could spend a lifetime of attending conferences and reading the literature just pondering what to review.